What is Laissez Faire Economic Theory?

An economic doctrine from the 18th century called laissez-faire rejected any government meddling in commercial matters. The core tenet of laissez-faire, a French phrase that means "leave alone" (literally, "let you do"), is that the less the government interferes with the market, the better off business will be, and consequently, society as a whole.

 

During the 18th century, the French Physiocrats created the laissez-faire philosophy. Although some have critiqued it for increasing inequality, later free-market economists expanded on the ideals of laissez-faire as a route to economic growth. Critics contend that some level of governmental control and intervention in the market is necessary.

 

The essential ideas of laissez-faire economics include the notion that economic rivalry represents a "natural order" that governs the universe. Laissez-faire economists contend that government interference in commercial and industrial matters is unnecessary since this spontaneous self-regulation is the best sort of regulation.

 

As a result, they are opposed to corporation taxes, minimum wages, levies, and other forms of government interference in the economy. They also reject any kind of legislation or regulation. Actually, proponents of laissez-faire economics view these taxes as a punishment for output.

 

 

What Is Laissez-Faire Economic Theory?

 

The key tenet of the laissez-faire economic theory is the limitation of government involvement in the market. Laissez-faire economics holds that when the government upholds individual rights while refraining from taking additional actions, the economy is at its healthiest. The French term "laissez-faire" translates as "let's do" or "leave us alone."

 

Simply put, laissez-faire economic theory advocates letting the market operate independently. The effective production of products and services will be guided by the rules of supply and demand without further assistance. 

 

Here, supply refers to human capital, financial resources, and natural resources. Demand, meanwhile, comprises the purchases made by the government, enterprises, and consumers.

 

A cornerstone of free-market capitalism is the economic idea of laissez-faire. According to the notion, a country's economy is at its healthiest when the government abstains from all economic activities and lets free market forces take their course.

 

In a laissez-faire system, the government's responsibility is to safeguard individual rights rather than to in any manner regulate enterprise. When it comes to economic interference, the phrase "laissez-faire" translates as "leave alone." This entails the absence of any taxes, rules, or tariffs. The natural rules of supply and demand should have total freedom to govern the market.

 

Laissez-faire economics has its roots in the Industrial Revolution of 18th-century France. Businesses at the time wanted to be left alone to run their operations without interference from government regulations that included high import tariffs. 

 

In books like "Wealth of Nations," Adam Smith promoted the theory of classical economics, which placed a priority on individual liberty and left economies up to the market's whims.

 

Also Read | Types of Economic Systems

 

History of Laissez-Faire

 

One of the first developed economic theories is the laissez-faire philosophy, which gained popularity in the middle of the 18th century. The Physiocrats, a group that existed in France from around 1756 to 1778, are credited with developing it.

 

These scholars attempted to analyze wealth and economic creation using scientific concepts and techniques. These so-called "économistes" maintained that a free market and unrestricted economic rivalry were crucial for the wellbeing of a free society.

 

The "invisible hand," termed by renowned British economist Adam Smith, is a set of inherent, unchangeable principles that regulate market forces and economic processes. These laws should be allowed to operate freely without interference from the government.

 

Sadly, an early attempt to put laissez-faire doctrines to the test failed. Turgot, Louis XVI's Controller-General of Finances, eliminated all restrictions on the tightly regulated grain market as an experiment in 1774, enabling imports and exports between provinces to function as a free trading system.

 

However, when low harvests led to shortages, prices skyrocketed. As a result, merchants were forced to stockpile goods or sell grain in high-profit locations, even outside of France, while tens of thousands of French people went hungry. Riots continued for a while. The government's oversight of the grain market was reinstated in the middle of 1775 along with the restoration of order.

 

Despite this unfavorable beginning, laissez-faire principles prevailed during the Industrial Revolution of the late 18th and early 19th centuries, further refined by British economists like Smith and David Ricardo. And, as its critics pointed out, it did lead to dangerous working conditions and widening income inequality.

 

Also Read | Economic Order Quantity: Challenges and Advantages

 

How Does Laissez-Faire In Economics Work?

 

The Industrial Revolution in the 18th century saw the rise in popularity of the political and economic ideology known as laissez-faire. During that time, the government imposed significant import levies on businesses. Furthermore, market forces have been significantly impacted by government intervention in the economy. Minimum wages, trade restrictions, customs, and corporation taxes had to be paid by sellers.

 

Its inception may be traced back to the years 1756–1778 in France, during which time legislator Boisguilbert, businessman François Legendre, and other physicists campaigned in favor of anti-mercantilist policies. 

 

They supported limited government intervention in corporate, industrial, and economic issues as well as the free market's natural order of economic competitiveness.

 

The Father of Economics, Adam Smith, was one of the theory's proponents. He held that this economic theory is the most equitable way to promote and direct a free market. Smith felt that when the government intervenes as little as possible, markets operate at their best.

 

Businesses may function autonomously more easily thanks to the laissez-faire philosophy. It enables companies and dealers to carry out commercial operations as profitably as feasible. 

 

Additionally, it gives people the freedom to decide on things like the amount of hours worked, hourly pay, working conditions, child labour, etc. Additionally, they can sustain supply and demand without the involvement of price-setting monopolies.

 

They may operate freely in the market without intervention from the government or other authorities, to put it briefly. Economic growth and a stronger business climate result from little to no government involvement. 

 

It ultimately results in free-market capitalism. Employees are allowed to make decisions under laissez-faire leadership while being directed by the leaders to whom they report.

 

Criticism of Laissez-Faire

 

The fact that capitalism as a system has moral ambiguities built into it and does not by nature defend the most vulnerable members of society is one of the main critiques of laissez-faire. While proponents of laissez-faire contend that if people put their personal interests first, social advantages would follow.

 

Laissez-faire is criticized for allegedly causing poverty and economic imbalances. They argue that the concept of allowing an economic system to function without control or correction effectively rejects or further victimizes people who need help the most.

 

The influential laissez-faire economist of the 20th century, John Maynard Keynes of Britain, maintained that the choice between market intervention and government action should be made on a case-by-case basis.

 

Today, the majority of nations have a mixed system of economy. However, laissez-faire economics continues to have an impact on how governments and businesses interact globally. 

 

This impact may be observed in neo-liberal movements, which frequently lead to the privatization of ineffective and underfunded public services. In the fields of healthcare, electrical generation, and water supply, this has occurred all over the world. 

 

Additionally, "trickle down economics" exhibits it. The premise behind this is that when businesses are given the freedom to maximize their profits with minimum government interference, the greater earnings would ultimately filter down to non-business owners, thus proving beneficial to everyone.

 

Also Read | What is an Economic Bubble?

 

Characteristics of Laissez-Faire Economic Theory

 

Take a look at some of the fundamental aspects of a laissez-faire economy.

---

Characteristics of Laissez Faire Economic Theory

---

 

1. Self-regulatory Market Forces

 

A laissez-faire free market economy has no intervention from or engagement by the government. Opponents of laissez-faire economics contend that supply and demand, rather than government intervention, govern the market.

 

2. Self-interested people

 

People living in a free market economy are motivated by a desire to meet their own wants. According to laissez-faire philosophy, individual demands ultimately result in societal benefits for the general welfare.

 

3. Free Trade

 

Proponents of laissez-faire contend that the economy is best served by a lack of import and export taxes, tariffs, and controls.

 

4. Lack of regulation

 

The working class endured uncontrolled working conditions and enormous wealth disparities throughout the industrial revolution as major businesses acquired more influence under laissez-faire laws. 

 

Since there is no mandate to offer a minimum salary or healthcare, firms have more opportunity to abuse people in an unregulated environment.

 

Also Read | Economic Indicators: Types and Examples

 

Pros and Cons of Laissez-faire Economic Theory

 

The advantages of laissez-faire include:

 

1. Autonomy

 

In a free-market system, firms have more freedom from restrictions imposed by the government that would make conducting business more challenging. Companies are more willing to take chances and invest in the economy in such an atmosphere. Additionally, it gives businesses a bigger incentive to strive to increase earnings.

 

2. Creativity

 

Companies are pushed to adopt a more creative and inventive strategy in order to provide their products a competitive edge on the market. The practice promotes economic expansion as well as technical improvement.

 

3. No Taxes

 

Finally, the absence of taxes increases the purchasing power of both businesses and employees. Additionally, it deters corruption that may develop as a result of bureaucrats with little regulatory experience.

 

In addition to its benefits, a laissez-faire economy has a few disadvantages:

 

1. Inequality of income

 

Thomas Hobbes believed that unlimited autonomy would lead to anarchy for both producers and consumers in a state-of-nature economy. In such an economy, wealth and income inequality can fuel a vicious cycle whereby inheritance is crucial to one's position in society's financial hierarchy. 

 

According to Adam Smith, monopolies may form in which they control supply, impose higher prices, and provide workers with lower incomes.

 

2. Failure to represent

 

A laissez-faire economy may only serve the needs of the majority or the wealthy class, failing to reflect the interests of all groups within a community. 

 

As a result, although items with negative externalities could be overconsumed, public goods with positive externalities, like healthcare and education, might not be distributed fairly in society.

 

Today, laissez-faire is used mainly as an adjective to describe how common its related characteristics are. Economic theory alone has the potential to cause significant income inequalities, injustices, and in certain circumstances recession. 

 

Most Western economies in the late 19th century were characterized by liberal policies supported by laissez-faire.

 

Laissez-faire alone is insufficient to steer an economy, but with the right balance between the authority granted to the government and the unrestricted operation of market forces, economies may prosper with the least amount of risk.